Management by p.r. stunt
Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel's offensive against Chicago public school teachers took a new twist just before the Labor Day weekend when school officials announced that teachers at three schools had voted to waive the union contract in order to extend the school day--a demand that Emanuel has been pressing relentlessly since taking office earlier this year.
, a veteran Chicago high school teacher and publisher of the Substance newspaper, reported on the details of the waiver claims and the union's angry reaction inOFFICERS OF the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) reacted with fury on the Friday before the Labor Day weekend upon learning that Jean-Claude Brizard, the controversial Chief Executive Officer of the Chicago Public Schools (CPS), had announced by press release that two Chicago elementary schools had supposedly voted for a waiver of the union contract to extend the school day by 90 minutes.
According to the union officials, the union had received no information, either from the schools or from the Board of Education that the supposed votes had taken place. By late afternoon, a third school had been added to the list, a school that had not even held its first class for students.
"This is an insult to all of our 30,000 members," CTU Vice President Jesse Sharkey told a small press conference hastily convened at the union's Merchandise Mart offices.
The two elementary schools were Skinner North Elementary School (640 W. Scott St.) and Melody Elementary (412 S. Keeler). According to union officials, union records showed that Skinner North had 14 teachers and Melody had 23.

Under the union's contract rules, waiver votes are supposed to take place upon 48 hours' notice and by secret ballot. In most cases, waivers are voted on by union teachers on the school's staff (other staff at the schools are also members of the CTU, or of other unions representing school workers). By late afternoon, union sources were saying that none of the waiver votes had been conducted legally, according to the union contract.
During the press conference, Sharkey told reporters who were able to make the event that the union had not been informed either by the schools or by CPS that the supposed waiver votes had taken place.
Later in the afternoon, union officials said that they had heard that a third school, the new STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) school (1522 W. Flournoy), had also voted on a contract waiver. STEM has not yet held its first class, since it is opening this school year. According to one union staff member, the school did not yet have a union delegate, and was therefore not legally able to hold a waiver vote without requesting that the vote be conducted by the union's representatives.
IN A statement issued on behalf of the union, Sharkey charged, "CTU contends that the board has coerced principals to force this waiver vote on their staff. We have heard of gifts being offered as bribes to teachers and other concessions if they vote for a longer school day."
The CTU also provided reporters with a copy of a grievance filed against the Board of Education on the waiver questions. The grievance, which was submitted to Cheryl Colson, director of Labor and Employee Relations at CPS on August 30, states:
The Chicago Teachers Union contends that individual school principals have demanded that the school union delegate and all bargaining unit members take a WAIVER vote to increase the school day an additional 90 minutes per day. The Chicago Teachers Union views this demand by the school principals as a form of coercion and a violation of the Agreement and Board Policy!'"
Union officials also told Substance that the union was consulting attorneys about whether the Chicago Board of Education had violated Illinois labor law and basic union contract law by offering incentives directly to teachers at the schools through the principals. Under Article 1 of the agreement between the Board of Education of the City of Chicago and the Chicago Teachers Union, the law and the contract bar management from negotiating directly with union members.
It is a long-established principle of labor law that the boss cannot circumvent the union's right to represent its members. The concept of management going directly to the workers is basic to the version of economic reality pushed by corporations like Wal-Mart, which maintain that every worker has the power to negotiate his or her terms and conditions of employment in an individual negotiation with the corporation.
The press release from CPS celebrating the supposed waiver vote at the first two schools included this statement in the name of both Mayor Emanuel and CEO Brizard:
We thank the courageous teachers and principals today for their dedication to investing in our children's future by supporting a longer school day. This is a historic step forward in bringing the kind of change we need in the classroom to help our children get the world-class education they deserve.
Despite the hard work of teachers throughout the system, our children are falling behind. They need more time in the classroom to be successful. Teachers stood up today to say they want to help lead this change. We support them and commend them for the message they are sending to our city that our children must come first. We hope more principals, teachers and parents will come together to put our children first.
THE LABOR Day weekend announcement follows weeks of public relations work by Chicago's mayor claiming that the CTU should be willing to accept a "2 percent" raise (after CPS rescinded the contractual 4 percent raise for all unionized workers at its first June meeting) and an extension of the school day by 90 minutes.
The campaign by Emanuel has included demonstrations at the Chicago Board of Education led by preachers who support the mayor (and who are often subsidized directly or indirectly by City Hall) and an announcement by Brizard on the Chicago Tonight TV show that the board was "offering" 2 percent for the longer school day the mayor was demanding.
Reporters were challenged sorting out the story because it broke late on the Friday before a major holiday, but some of the details were emerging by late on September 2.
At Skinner North Elementary School, Principal Ethan Netterstrom told Substance that the vote took place on the morning of September 2, and the result was 9 to 6 in favor of "yes." The school has 15 teachers, one clerk, one security aide, one special education aide and one assistant principal, according to Netterstrom.
He confirmed that CPS officials had told him that the school would receive an additional $150,000 if it approved the waiver. He said that the only condition he was aware of was that the money could not be used to pay teachers for an extended school day.
Calls to CPS Chief Communications Officer Becky Carroll weren't returned as of the evening of September 2, so Substance wasn't able to confirm the conditions of the use of the $150,000 or how much money total is available from CPS if other elementary schools were to decide to take CPS up on the same offer.
It's also unclear what the "2 percent raise" attached to the extra 90 minutes means. According to several sources who asked to remain anonymous because they are in a position to face retaliation from the city or CPS, the teachers have also been promised a raise of "2 percent" for accepting the waiver, although at press time, it was unclear what the 2 percent would apply to.
One rumor has it that all teachers, regardless of their time in the system, would receive a raise based on 2 percent of the average Chicago teacher salary, which this year, according to estimates, is just under $70,000 per year. But starting teachers, which includes some of the staffs at places like Skinner North, earn $20,000 less than the average.
No one has provided Substance with a copy of the exact wording of the "2 percent" offer, and one union official predicted that the promised raise would prove a disappointment to the teachers who have supported the deal, saying that they would be calling the union sometime during the school year to file a grievance when the "raise" was either not paid or not paid in the amount they had been led to believe in early September. The wording of the waiver materials upon which the teachers allegedly voted does not include the specifics of the raise claim.
The math behind the $150,000 per school deal--which has been confirmed, but not in detail by top CPS officials--is clear enough. "At Skinner, that comes to $10,000 per teacher," CTU Vice President Jesse Sharkey told Substance after the union leaders independently confirmed the $150,000 figure.
Officials noted that if all 400 CPS elementary schools were to vote for waivers as demanded by Brizard and Emanuel, the total cost would be at least $70 million. Since June 17, CPS officials have claimed they were facing such an enormous "deficit" that they didn't have any money to pay for the 4 percent raise guaranteed to teachers and other union workers in CPS under the terms of the fifth year of the system's seven union contracts.
By late on September 2, questions were also being raised about whether a waiver referendum would apply to all those who work at the schools in question.
In addition to the teachers who allegedly voted in favor of the deal, each school has administrators (a principal and at least one assistant principal), engineers, and lunchroom, custodial and other staff. Additionally, so-called "citywide" staff are at the schools on assigned days, and their rights have now been affected by the votes of the teachers whom the mayor is praising for their "courage."